Judge Mike Lynch Monday denied a request for bond reduction for Robert Springsteen, meaning he will remain in jail.
Springsteen is a defendant in the Yogurt Shop murders case from 1991 in which four young women were found murdered at a North Austin “I Can’t Believe it’s Not Yogurt” shop.
The co-defendant in the case, Michael Scott, is scheduled for trial July 6, and jury selection begins Friday, June 26.
In the findings and conclusions on Springsteen’s bond reduction request Judge Lynch said Scott’s trial is the No. 1 priority.
“A full-blown hearing on Springsteen’s motion would have consumed a great deal of time and resources,” Lynch stated in the document. “Additionally, such a hearing on the eve of the Scott jury selection and trial could hamper both parties in achieving a fair trial in that case.”
Springsteen's attorney said he understands the decision but is anticipating the trial.
"My client is being denied because of the admitted limited scope of the hearing, but we will respect the court's decision and anticipate the upcoming trial as another chance for the truth to be heard," attorney Joe James Sawyer said.
Springsteen's defense felt DNA evidence could be the key to Springsteen's freedom. Evidence that was initially discovered by state prosecutors has now become a weapon used by the defense.
"They thought they were going to get an YSTR result and hammer the point home, but instead they got the truth and they can't handle it," Sawyer said last week at the bond reduction hearing.
YSTR is a forensic DNA testing method that looks for only male DNA.
It wasn't available when the case first went to trial. During the 2008 testing, the state found an unknown male profile in the evidence from the crime.
 |  |
 | |  |
| | | | | | | |
Springsteen in Court
News 8's Catie Beck explains the reason behind the bond reduction request following Thursday's hearing.
 
| | |
| | | | | |
|
"The result of this hearing is that there is one unknown male donor that we have been searching for since March of 2008," Rosemary Lehmberg, Travis County District Attorney, said Thursday.
The defense would argue there could be more than one unknown. But, the point they wanted to make was that it is unknown. That means it does not match any of the four suspects that were originally charged.
State prosecutors are still looking, but the defense said that the evidence shatters the state's case.
"Their expert and any expert they can buy have to conclude that is true, it was not any one of these four boys," Sawyer said.
State prosecutors argued that the defense used DNA samples that were too small to be certain, and they didn't follow thorough methods by double testing.
This was Springsteen’s third attempt at bail reduction.
